Read the excerpt from "BigDog on the Move.” A researcher held the hose that connected the robot to its power source. It looked like he was walking a mechanical dog on a leash.

Why did the author most likely include the underlined descriptive details?

to convince the reader the robot is a pet
to convince the reader the robot is a rascal
to entertain the reader with an amusing image
to entertain the reader with an unusual joke

Hey there ;)

Given that:

Question:- Why did the author most likely include the underlined descriptive details?

(A) to convince the reader the robot is a pet

(B) to convince the reader the robot is a rascal

(C) to entertain the reader with an amusing image

(D) to entertain the reader with an unusual joke

-

The correct answer is Option D.

Explaination:-

Since its written "A researcher held the hose that connected the robot to its power source. It looked like he was walking a mechanical dog on a leash."

This tells that the researcher is doing a specific work and for its use, he is using the robot. As he uses it, he connects a hose for his job. From the researcher's usage, it feels nothing unusual. But from the reader's perspective, it may feel like a common situation in which people tie a dog. Even though it isnt what is happening now but it relates to such a comedy situation.

Therefore Option D or fourth option is correct.

we need the diagram to answer this correctly.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.