after the french and indian war, the british parliament passed many new acts to regain control over colonial life. however, colonists were still angry about the enforcement of some older laws which were still in effect. which explains the colonial anger over the enforcement of existing laws?

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

The bishnoi conservationist is take care of nature and grow with it, instead of exploiting it explain the statement

According to your text, systems of government in the united states are shifting from what to what?