i need help with a question that says "how did political change in england affect colonial goverments"

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

Ademocratic government is based on majority rule of the people. this would be impossible under the large republic proposed by the constitution. which of the following best describes this quote? it represents the perspective of a federalist, arguing for a strong central government. it represents the perspective of a federalist, arguing for a stronger role for the states. it represents the perspective of an anti-federalist, arguing for a strong central government. it represents the perspective of an anti-federalist, arguing for a stronger role for the states.

Which of the following are ways that people in democracies can take part in politics and gonverments