subject
Social Studies, 05.12.2021 05:30 kingofguns2826

Chứng minh năng lượng là vật chất

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30
Charles schenck was a u.s. citizen and private in the army. while in military training during world war i, schenck printed and passed out leaflets explaining why he was against the draft (required military service). he was charged with violating the espionage act of 1917, a federal law outlawing any action interfering with military operations. schenck believed the espionage act violated his right to free speech. in which court would this case ultimately be decided, and why? a state criminal court, because schenck was accused of violating a criminal law a military tribunal, because the matter involved members of the military a county civil court, because it involved violation of a civil liberty the u.s. supreme court, because schenck challenged whether the law was constitutional
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:30
What does the point on the graph represent? a. aggregate supply and demand equilibrium b. aggregate supply c. aggregate rising prices and supply d. aggregate rise in gdp
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:30
Which quotation reflects the perspective of most of georgia legislatures in 1956 regarding the georgia state flag?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50
Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Chứng minh năng lượng là vật chất...
Questions
question
World Languages, 15.10.2020 06:01
question
Mathematics, 15.10.2020 06:01
question
Biology, 15.10.2020 06:01
question
History, 15.10.2020 06:01
Questions on the website: 13722363