Politicians are no strangers to using political spin to improve favorability ratings related to specific events (such as economic downturns). For this assignment, you will consider what actions a president or politician might take to improve favorability ratings during an economic downturn. You can use real world examples. Consider the positive and negative side effects of such an action (cause and effect relationships), as well as potential long-term consequences in your decision-making model. Your response should be approximately 1-2 paragraphs in length. Your grade will be based upon the thoughtfulness of your response, and its analytic nature. This assignment is worth 20 points.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.