Để bảo vệ các quyền và lợi ích hợp pháp của mình một cách hiệu quả nhất công dân cần

The defendant and an accomplice were on trial together for burglary. both had given confessions implicating themselves and their accomplice. at trial, the defendant maintained that his confession had been obtained through improper coercion by the police. for the purpose of countering the claim of coercion, the prosecution seeks to place the accomplice’s confession into evidence. after objection by the defendant’s counsel, the judge agrees to issue a limiting instruction to the jury that the confession is to be considered only with regard to the question of whether the defendant’s confession was coerced. may the accomplice’s confession be admitted under that condition?

How did the growth of railroads american businesses expand

If both the president and the vice president can no longer serve, who will become the next head of state?