Looking at the media coverage of the "Lives Matter" movements, did the coverage make it seem like it was possible for a person to support both movements or did it seem like a person had to pick a side? Do you feel it is possible to support both sides? Explain

Lives matter movement in the media is slowly dying down lately. even in the media. but before when it was still a topic that's constantly got brought up in conversations people usually choose a side between all lives matter, white lives matter, and black lives matter. the media/ news doesn't really choose a side because it only reports what big is happening in the world. while other social media influencers choose sides, most would choose back lives matter. a lot of them would go on protests and riots just to prove their point. although some support white lives matter or all lives matter. with this, in mind, I do think that it isn't easy to support both sides but it is possible. it isn't easy because people would always judge you by your opinion but it is possible because in your head you'd know how you really feel.

Explanation:

I'm sorry if this doesn't make sense.

acts of terrorism occur globally. the united nations global counter-terrorism strategy was created in order to build adequate systems of support and solidarity with victims of terrorism. here´s a summary of the proposed key themes: the importance of giving victims a face and a voice; protecting their dignity; giving victims legal status and defending their legal rights; providing victims with medical, psycho-social and financial support; building solidarity with victims; improving media coverage of victims; and focusing on the link between victims and counter-terrorism efforts more generally.