Social Studies, 25.10.2021 20:10 lordcaos066

1. Choose one of the following contentious issues to address in a written letter to your representative. Civil rights
Education
Environmental regulations
Healthcare
Immigration
Marriage
Military
Product safety
Roads and highways
Taxes

2. Research your topic and find either a historical or current event that concerned both federal and state governments.
One example for education is teacher certification.

3. Begin writing your letter with an introductory greeting, then complete your letter by including the following:
Describe how the federal and state government have historically not agreed on solving the issue. (one paragraph)
Describe how the conflict has been solved or is being solved. Include public policies or court cases that impact the solution. (one paragraph)
Analyze how American federalism distributes, shares, and limits power and responsibility. Use examples from other issues or court cases as evidence to support your position. (one paragraph)
Evaluate the success or failure of the solution(s) for your chosen issue. Recommend a better way to nurture good relations in the future. (one paragraph)
End your letter with a formal closing.

4. Include a bibliography using at least two sources in MLA or APA citation format. Use Easy Bib to help you create the citation.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:30

On this map, the state of georgia is in which section of the map?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:00

In the vals framework, self-expression-motivated consumers who have fewer resources and express themselves and experience the world by working on it are referred to as experiencers thinkers strivers believers makers

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30

The name of mexico before it won independence

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00

Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

1. Choose one of the following contentious issues to address in a written letter to your representat...

Questions