subject
Social Studies, 19.10.2021 23:50 salma1018

In which of the following scenarios does the Military Spouses Residency Relief Act apply? Assume all nonmilitary spouses have California-source income and none choose to change their state of residence. Cody is stationed in California but domiciled in Arizona, which is where he met and married Jennifer. Jennifer, who is in California solely to be with Cody, easily finds a job at a local day care. Sally joined the military in Texas and was immediately stationed in California. She met and married Dorian while on vacation in Hawaii. Dorian remained in Hawaii to work. Nick, a Mississippi resident, met and married LeAnn, a California resident, while he was stationed in California. LeAnn remains in the state solely to be with Nick. Emma and Quintin are both domiciled in California. Quintin was stationed in San Diego until June 30, 2020, when he received PCS orders for a base in Connecticut. Emma remained in California to finish graduate school.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:20
Gettysburg address question. what is the best line from the address? why do you think so?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:00
According to machiavelli what will happen to a leader when things go wrong and he is in need of support
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:10
Recall this unitโ€™s essential question: what are the benefits and risks of interdependence? provide examples as evidence from your studies to explain two benefits and two risks of interdependence.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In which of the following scenarios does the Military Spouses Residency Relief Act apply? Assume all...
Questions
question
English, 27.12.2019 15:31
question
Business, 27.12.2019 15:31
Questions on the website: 13722360