"federalism increase public participation" justify this statement

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

The persian wars started when emperor darius i began an invasion of greece. what caused darius to decide to attack greece? a. greek pirates had raided persia's merchant ships and coastal towns. b. greek armies had attacked and taken over land that belonged to persia. c. greek city-states had supported rebellions in the persian empire. d. greek leaders had declared independence from the persian empire.

1. explain the impact on colonial life of the religious revival movement known as the great awakening. be sure to discuss its social as well as religious effects. what do you imagine some of the great awakening’s “significant political consequences” alluded to by eric foner might have been?