Ian pay for nothing, ya better answer this Use pages 60-64 to answer questions 12-15.
12. What do Clauses 11-16 ensure and regulate?
13. What congressional powers are explained in Clause 17?
14. Which branch of the government is outlined in Article II?
15. How are the President and Vice President actually elected?
Use page 65 to answer questions 16-17
16. What courts does the Constitution include in the judiciary?
17. What power does Article III give to the third branch of
government?

Explanation:

12. anything military

quizlet

13. enables Congress to govern the District of Columbia

hobnobblog

14. Which branch of the government is outlined in Article II?

vests executive power in the President of the United States

cornell law

15. they're chosen by “electors” through a process called the Electoral College

usagov

16. trial courts, courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court

constitutioncenter

17.the courts to handle cases or controversies arising under federal law, as well as other enumerated areas

wikipedia

i am not in high school so i don’t know

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: