subject
Social Studies, 17.09.2021 02:30 shikiaanthony

I like the power given the Legislature to levy taxes, and for that reason solely I approve of the greater house being chosen by the people directly. For though I think a house so chosen . . . will be very illy [badly] qualified to legislate for the Union, for foreign nations, etc., yet this evil does not weigh against the good of preserving . . . the fundamental principle that the people are not to be taxed but by representatives chosen . . . by themselves. Which of the following summarizes Jefferson’s views of “the people” in this passage?

entirely incapable of legislating for the Union
not qualified to legislate on some matters, but entitled to key rights
undeserving of being taxed by their government
the best choice to create legislation for the Union on all matters

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 16:00
What did americans do to support the troops in iraq? tell about the various activities and contributions that americans make to our soldiers abroad. evaluate their efforts and compare them to the efforts of american citizens during world war i.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:30
Why does c. wright mills identify critical thinking as one of the most important criteria for the development of intellectual craftsmanship? why is constantly being aware of the biased nature of your reactions and interactions (what c. wright mills calls self-reflexive) key to the development of that critical thinking? finally, why is keeping a file important, how can it lean to intellectual curiosity which can foster critical thinking and to develop a keen analytical mind?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 23:30
Adolescents can display egocentrism when they become about changes in their lives.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
I like the power given the Legislature to levy taxes, and for that reason solely I approve of the gr...
Questions
question
Physics, 22.05.2020 00:57
question
Mathematics, 22.05.2020 00:57
question
Mathematics, 22.05.2020 00:57
question
Mathematics, 22.05.2020 00:57
Questions on the website: 13722361