subject
Social Studies, 16.09.2021 18:40 luusperezzz

AP United States Government and Politics Quiz Pt 2 6. How does the executive branch check the powers of the legislative branch?

A. The president can replace the Speaker of the House with her own appointee.
B. The president can veto any legislation that is approved by Congress.
C. The executive branch has to enforce only laws that it sees as in line with its policy agenda.
D. If the president is impeached, he or she can veto the decision and have a new impeachment trial held.

7. Which action is an informal check by the executive branch on the legislative branch?

A. The president can hold state governors accountable for their unconstitutional acts.
B. The executive branch can choose to implement new laws without approval if it sees them as constitutional.
C. Though not in the Constitution, the president can replace a Supreme Court justice whenever she wishes.
D. The executive branch can set forth its policy agenda in the public realm, thus creating pressure for Congress to act.

8. What did the Marbury v. Madison case decide about governmental checks and balances?

A. It required congressional approval of presidential nominees.
B. It enabled presidents to veto Congressional bills even before they were voted on by Congress.
C. It established the process of judicial review and the Supreme Court’s oversight over the other branches.
D. It was the first case of presidential impeachment in the United States, resulting in a conviction.

9. What was the intention of the Framers for checks and balances at the state level?

A. State governments would check the power of the national government by passing laws regarding state matters.
B. State representatives in the House would check the power of their respective governors.
C. State courts would check the power of the Supreme Court in the complex appeals process.
D. States had no part in the separation of powers because they were viewed as weaker than the national government.

10. Use the passage to answer the question.
In order to lay a due foundation for that separate and distinct exercise of the different powers of government, which to a certain extent is admitted on all hands to be essential to the preservation of liberty, it is evident that each department should have a will of its own; and consequently should be so constituted that the members of each should have as little agency as possible in the appointment of the members of the others. . . . It is equally evident, that the members of each department should be as little dependent as possible on those of the others, for the emoluments annexed to their offices.

What is Madison’s primary motivation in the separation of powers in the national government? Do the provisions outlined in the Constitution line up with Madison’s reasoning? Why or why not? Your response should be one paragraph in length.

Please help will give brainlist to correct answer.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:00
What do supreme court decisions based on the first amendment usually involve?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:40
"there will be differences in degree of mood elevation seen in depressed clients after receiving either cognitive-behavioral or psychoanalytic therapy."; in this hypothesis, mood elevation is the:
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:00
What effect did the enclosure acts have on people’s working lives? a. changes brought about by the acts prevented large farmers from taking lands from smaller farmers. b. small farmers could no longer work on common lands and had to move to cities for work. c. peasants started working on enclosed lands and soon became wealthy because of higher wages. d. landowners forced peasants to build roads and bridges as part of the new enclosure laws.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
An employee of the state government always received his state paycheck on the last workday of the month. the employee was not a good money manager, and just barely managed to make it from paycheck to paycheck each month. on the second to the last workday of the month, the employee had $45 in his checking account, and, needing to buy a birthday gift for his sister, he wrote a check to a gift boutique for $100. he knew that he would be receiving his paycheck the next day, so he could deposit the paycheck before the check would be sent to the bank.however, unbeknownst to the employee, the state legislature was having a budget impasse. because the state constitution prohibited any deficit spending, state employees were not paid as usual. without a paycheck to deposit, the check written to the gift boutique was returned for insufficient funds. the merchant complained to the police, who arrested the employee and charged him under a statute that prohibited "issuing a check knowing that it is drawn against insufficient funds, with intent to defraud the payee of the check."what should be the outcome of the employee's prosecution? a not guilty, because the employee intended to deposit his paycheck the next day.b not guilty, because it was reasonable for the employee to expect that he would receive his paycheck as usual.c guilty, because the employee knew when he wrote the check that he did not have sufficient funds in his account to honor it.d guilty, because reliance on a future source of income does not vitiate the employee's violation of the statute when he wrote the check.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
AP United States Government and Politics Quiz Pt 2 6. How does the executive branch check the powe...
Questions
question
History, 29.07.2019 23:30
Questions on the website: 13722367