Answers: 1
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30
You are a member of the jury for a murder case. the prosecution has presented dna evidence linking the defendant to the crime scene. the defense claims that dna evidence using str analysis with 13 markers is not sufficient to reliably distinguish between people. what do you think? a. the defense is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 1 million chance of two people having the same pattern, leaving a reasonable doubt. b. str analysis is not sufficient. the defendant's entire genome should be sequenced. the prosecution will have to consult a genomic library to make sure their dna evidence is valid. c. the prosecution is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 10 billion or greater chance that two people will have the same pattern. this person was at the crime scene. d. dna evidence is not generally accepted by legal experts.
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:30
In exchange for land, a knight agrees to be a sort of sub-vassal to a vassal. this agreement was known as: investiture homage tyranny subinfeudation
Answers: 3
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 23:30
Astudent receives a pell grant based on the_.a.satb.nasac.fafsad.act
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:20
4. write short introduction to aaran and jaanto technology.
Answers: 2
What do jews believe about personal responsibilty?...
English, 08.09.2020 20:01
Mathematics, 08.09.2020 20:01
Mathematics, 08.09.2020 20:01
Mathematics, 08.09.2020 20:01
Chemistry, 08.09.2020 20:01
Chemistry, 08.09.2020 20:01
History, 08.09.2020 20:01
SAT, 08.09.2020 20:01