Esther is pulled over for crossing the yellow line with her automobile. The officer suspects Esther is intoxicated, so she administers a field sobriety test. Esther blows a .16 on the test, so the officer arrests Esther for DWI. Esther decides to fight the charge. Her defense is that she is an alcoholic, and the laws against driving while intoxicated unconstitutionally discriminate against her and other alcoholics. Does Esther have a valid defense to her DWI charge? A. Yes, she does because laws that regulate economic or social issues are presumed invalid, and the courts will apply intermediate scrutiny in evaluating whether such laws discriminate against people.
B. Yes, she does because laws that regulate economic or social issues are presumed invalid, and the courts will apply minimum scrutiny in evaluating whether such laws discriminate against people.
C. No, she does not because laws that regulate economic or social issues are presumed valid, and the courts will apply intermediate scrutiny in evaluating whether such laws discriminate against people.
D. No, she does not because laws that regulate economic or social issues are presumed valid, and the courts will apply minimum scrutiny in evaluating whether such laws discriminate against people.