subject
Social Studies, 27.07.2021 16:40 deepspy599otchpd

A landowner owned a large tract of land in an area zoned for medium residential use. Permitted uses in this zone are single-family dwellings, condominium and townhouse developments, and moderate density apartment complexes. The landowner subdivided her land into 10 lots and conveyed each lot by a deed restricting the land to single-family use. All deeds were duly recorded and all lots were developed as single-family homes. The owner of lot 1 died and his property passed by will to his niece. Some time later, the owner of lot 3 sold his property to a buyer by a deed that did not contain the covenant limiting use to single-family dwellings. The buyer subsequently sold lot 3 to her friend, and did not include the covenant in the deed. Both deeds were duly recorded. A storm destroyed the friend's home, and in its place he began to build a three-unit townhouse.

May the niece sue to enforce the covenant against the friend to prevent him from building the townhouse on lot 3?
A. No, because there is no privity with the friend.
B. No, because the zoning laws have not been violated.
C. No, because there was no restriction in the friend's deed.
D. Yes, because the friend's townhouse would alter the landowner's common scheme.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00
Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u.s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:00
50 ! kate is 14 years old and just started taking dance classes with her friends at a local dance studio. this is her first time in a dance program, so everything is new to her. her friends convinced her to join the class since they have been enjoying it for a few months. how could the following terms her succeed in the dance class? โ— secondary reinforcement โ— identity vs. role confusion โ— observational learning how could the following terms hinder her success in the class? โ— circadian rhythm โ— basal ganglia โ— vestibular sense
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:40
Which of the following people would a member of congress most likely contact for information on pending revenue legislation? a) a bureaucrat in a foreign government's revenue service. b) the host of a popular talk show c) the staff at one of the congressional support agencies d) athletes on a professional sports team form a major city
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 10:30
The party that has the second most members in the house but not the most
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
A landowner owned a large tract of land in an area zoned for medium residential use. Permitted uses...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722363