A homeowner and a carpenter entered into an oral agreement, under which the carpenter agreed to construct an addition to the homeowner's home, using materials supplied by the homeowner, in exchange for $20,000. After the work had been completed but before the homeowner had made any payment, the carpenter called the homeowner and instructed him to pay the $20,000 due on the addition work to a creditor of the carpenter. If the homeowner fails to pay the creditor, and the creditor thereafter brings an action against the homeowner for $20,000, is the creditor likely to prevail?
A Yes, because the creditor was the intended beneficiary of the contract between the homeowner and the carpenter.
B Yes, because there has been a proper assignment by the carpenter.
C No, because personal service contracts are not assignable.
D No, because the performance was not executory on both sides at the time of the assignment.