Passage A: Each marble in this bag has mass and weight. Therefore, the bag as a whole has mass and weight.

Passage B:
Team A was clearly prepared for the pressures of tonight's championship game. We can therefore assume that even their third-string center, who rarely played at all this season, was also ready for the pressures of the game.

Passage C:
Every hockey player on team A has more individual talent than the players on team B; therefore, team A is a better hockey team than team B.

Passage D:
Either you're going to give me your sandwich, or else I will have to punch you in the eye.

Passage E:
I enjoyed every second of my day today! Therefore, this was a truly enjoyable day.

Passage A, B,C, D,E commit a fallacy. Specifically, it commit the fallacy of composition, and it - commit the fallacy of division.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.