Obviously, if people are swerving wildly from lane to lane while driving, then they are reckless drivers and ought to have their license suspended. So I don't understand why that woman, who crossed into my lane and crashed into me while swerving to avoid a pedestrian, hasn't had her license suspended. A. Does this passage commit a fallacy?
B. Does it commut an appeal to pity fallacy?

Which best describes california population when it became a state in 1850? a.because of the gold rush attracting settlers all over the world california population diverse.bcalifornia had banned foreign immigrants at the start of the gold rush.so,the states population was made up of entirely of americans from other parts of the country.c california had a large african population because many southern planters had moved their enslaved africans to start large farms.d the indian removal act had led to the relocation of thousands of eastern native americans to california.as,a result the majority of californias population was native american

The concept of limited government holds that

What kind of government is based on the idea of popular sovereignty?