Objectives of report manakamana temple​

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

jhcctvhuinnbnb jb bji

the answer is "meiosis ii in the mother".

the procedure of meiosis includes two divisions of the hereditary material. the main division is known as the decrease division – or meiosis i – on the grounds that it lessens the quantity of chromosomes from 46 chromosomes or 2n to 23 chromosomes or (n depicts a solitary chromosome set). in people, the decrease division results in two sperm cells each with 23 chromosomes or an egg cell with 23 chromosomes and one disposed of polar body. the second division – or meiosis ii – is called equational division. the two sperm cells split again creating four sperm cells, each with 23 or n chromosomes. in oogenesis, the egg cell and polar body partition to shape the ovum and two extra polar bodies. along these lines, the posterity are guaranteed to get one portion of the chromosomes from the mother and one half from the dad.