Suppose that a person, Mike, believes that in order for an entity, X, to have a right to life, X must have a desire to live. Suppose that another person, Don, believes that in order for an entity, X, to have a right to life, X must have a valuable future with experiences and activities like those of most adult human beings. What would be the most effective critique that Mike, utilizing his own theory, could state against Don's theory

Lance is a member of the professional organization iceaa. he always attends its annual conferences because it provides a great opportunity for with members of the same profession. in addition to the conference, iceaa organizes for members who are seeking better employment opportunities.

As bob is driving on an exit off the freeway, he comes to a stop light and sees a homeless man asking people for spare change. “see, he’s a perfect example of why we shouldn’t be giving welfare benefits to the homeless,” bob mutters to his wife. “he’s too lazy to get a job, but he’s healthy enough to beg people for their hard-earned money all day long.” what are the sample and the target in bob’s argument? are there any inductive fallacies present in bob’s reasoning (bias, hastiness, appeal to anecdotal evidence, self-selection)? if so, explain why. if not, explain why not.

Which of the following statements concerning gender differences correctly describes an effect on workplace​ communication? a. women emphasize content and outcomes in their communication​ efforts, whereas men place a higher premium on relationship maintenanc b. outdated concepts of gender and sexual orientation are no longer a source of​ confusion, controversy, and discrimination. c. the share of management roles held by men compared with those held by women remains equal the further up the corporate ladder one goes. d. the perception of gender roles in business varies from culture to​ culture, and gender bias can range from overt discrimination to subtle and even unconscious beliefs. e. evidence suggests that men and women tend to have the same communication styles.