You seek to understand why your neighbor never votes. You conduct extensive interviews with your neighbor, as well his parents, wife, former teachers, and supervisor at work. Among the many factors you identify are your neighbor's lack of partisanship, low level of interest in government and politics, poor performance in school from a young age, need to work multiple jobs in order to pay the bills and so forth. What kind of explanation are you providing

1.how is germany's economic system similar to that of the united kingdom a.both are free-market economic b.both are command economic c.both are mixed economic d.both are traditional economic

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

If you wish to make an explicit comparison of two dissimilar things without using like or as you would use the