In a study to determine whether viewing pictures of poverty-stricken children increases the tendency for people to donate money to charity, the experimental group sees pictures of poor children before being asked to donate to charity. The control group sees pictures of random landscapes. In this study, the operational definition of the dependent variable is the

The dependent variable is the amount of money each group chooses to donate.

Explanation:

A simple way to be able to identify the dependent variable from the independent variable is to observe which element of the research is stimulating something to happen and what this "something" is. This is because the independent variable is the one that has the power to influence the occurrence of "something." This "something" is the dependent variable that occurs when it is influenced by the independent variable.

In the case of the above experiment, we can see that researchers want to research whether looking at pictures of poor children is able to influence the amount of money a person would donate to a charity. Thus, we can affirm that the picture of poor children is the independent variable of the experiment, while the amount of money donated by each group is the dependent variable.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

is there answer choices?