HELP PLEASE I have 2 questions left of this assignment and dont know the answer.. Explain the factors that inhibit permanent democratic changes in Russia.​

Russia's sheer size makes it hard for any one person to mount a campaign as "the people's choice." While other democracies are large, such as Canada and the United States, Russia does not have the infrastructure to allow someone to campaign easily from Moscow to Vladivostok. Weather can also be a factor, as the northern parts of the country are almost inaccessible in winter. There is also the issue of corruption, which has existed throughout Russian history. Media channels can be easily controlled and votes can be bought directly. Since Russia is a powerful nation, international agencies will not complain loudly of voter fraud. While the Russian economy has improved in the time after the Cold War, it is still vulnerable and oligarchs still maintain a lot of power. This is not likely to change any time soon. While youth movements in Russia are encouraging open elections and more democracy, this is not likely to happen any time soon as long as a small group of leaders continue to hold nearly total control over the country. Greater media access to the far-reaches of Russia would allow a candidate to campaign virtually all over the country. This is an encouraging sign for Russia to one day have a truly elected leader.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

because he had a big bear belly