You want to buy a new cell phone that costs $80 and two new video games that cost $40 each, but you don't have enough money saved for all of it. Which of the following best describes the opportunity costs involved in your purchase decision? (3 points) If you buy a new cell phone, your opportunity cost is the money you spend to purchase the phone. If you buy two new games, your opportunity cost is the money you spend to purchase the games. If you buy a new cell phone, your opportunity cost is the time you could spend talking on the phone. If you buy two new games, your opportunity cost is the time you could spend talking on the phone.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

the chair is the committee member from the majority party who has the most seniority. in the south carolina senate, the chair is the committee member from the majority party who has the most committee seniority.

answer; the parasympathetic nervous system;