Why should scientists continue to monitor co2 concentrations in the same way when there are new and different questions that have emerged that can't be answered by the old way of monitoring?

I think it is on the grounds that it searches more for long haul patterns. Is observing horribly at comparable locales so it doesn't present estimations or relic that can report this progressions that don't have a sudden change in long haul patterns

Afine-grained igneous rock forms as a result of slow cooling.