What evidence did darwin use to support his theory of evolution? check all that apply.
a) in-depth studies of individual organisms
b) observations of fossils
c) finches on different islands had different types of beaks
d) young finches that acquired desirable traits as they aged
e)observations of different species with varying traits

(B) Darwin, which focused on the appearance of new species as substitutes for extinct species of the same natural group, making the comparison of fossil and modern specimens of the same natural group.

(C) Birds that are known as "Darwin's finches", For example, there were three or four distinct "varieties" or species of finches on the different islands. The most important differences between the species are in the size and shape of the beak.

He saw the slightly different forms of finches and turtles on different islands as early stages in the development of new species from common ancestors.

(D) He did observe that on the islands there are different forms of animals that would otherwise be similar. Their attention was also directed to the differences in the shapes of the giant tortoise shells, with each island in a slightly different form.  

The replacement of extinct species by modern ones, as in the case of giant armadillos and sloths, the micro-version of the same geographic replacement patterns in different islands in a chain, finches and turtles.

The correct answers are: B, C and D.  

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

are there actual statements because if not my answer would be: that using the five senses the author can create a sense of worth in an object to appeal to the reader and create meaning.