subject
Social Studies, 17.09.2019 09:30 81074

Despite the fact that there are more than enough homes in the washington,
d. c. area, many families are still homeless. why?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30
The defendant and an accomplice were on trial together for burglary. both had given confessions implicating themselves and their accomplice. at trial, the defendant maintained that his confession had been obtained through improper coercion by the police. for the purpose of countering the claim of coercion, the prosecution seeks to place the accomplice’s confession into evidence. after objection by the defendant’s counsel, the judge agrees to issue a limiting instruction to the jury that the confession is to be considered only with regard to the question of whether the defendant’s confession was coerced. may the accomplice’s confession be admitted under that condition?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:40
Explain how civil liberties differ from civil rights and how each are protected in the united states. in your explanation, provide examples of at least one civil liberty and at least one civil right
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:40
Mrs. walter’s husband died in 2016. she has not remarried and has maintained a home for herself and her dependent son, whom she can claim as a dependent. in the summer of 2018, the son was killed in an automobile accident. what is mrs. walter’s filing status for 2018
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50
Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Despite the fact that there are more than enough homes in the washington,
d. c. area, many fam...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 24.04.2020 21:23
question
English, 24.04.2020 21:23
question
Biology, 24.04.2020 21:23
Questions on the website: 13722361