subject
Social Studies, 29.08.2019 11:30 jacquetpaul1969

The great compromise resolved the controversial issue of

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:00
For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:00
Who gave the famous "i have a dream" speech at the march on washington?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:00
The industrial revolution began in great britain for a number of reasons. two advantages great britain had which were necessary for industrialization were a. raw materials and a large workforce. b. unstable politics and a small landmass. c. abundant land and a small population. d. private wealth and a strong military.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:30
Donald was arrested for murdering an acquaintance. at the trial, donald takes the stand and testifies that he and the victim knew each other. he admits that they would drink and use drugs together. one night while partying, donald explains in his testimony, an argument got out of hand during a card game. donald explains that the victim accused him of cheating and pulled out a knife on him and started swinging it in the air. donald said that he had no choice but to pull out his gun and shoot the victim. the jury convicted donald of manslaughter. who would argue that donald weighed the potential costs and benefits of shooting the victim and decided to pull the trigger as a result of free will? a. a rational choice theorist b. a critical criminologist c. a conflict theorist d. a positivist
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
The great compromise resolved the controversial issue of...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 30.06.2019 13:00
question
Social Studies, 30.06.2019 13:00
question
Chemistry, 30.06.2019 13:00
question
Social Studies, 30.06.2019 13:00
question
Mathematics, 30.06.2019 13:00
Questions on the website: 13722361