Social Studies, 22.12.2019 15:31 duncanje5783

What's the biggest landslide victory in us presidential election history?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:30

In a citizens elect the president as head of government separate loy from the legislature

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:20

Humphreys collecting data for the tearoom trade study under the pretense that he was a lookout is an example of a violation of the principle of: a. justice.b. beneficence.c. respect for persons.

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:40

Ageneral requirement for informed consent is that no informed consent may include any exculpatory language. exculpatory language is that which waives or appears to waive any of the subject’s legal rights or releases or appears to release those conducting the research from liability for negligence. which of the following statements in a consent form is an example of exculpatory language? taking part in the research is voluntary, but if you choose to take part, you waive the right to legal redress for any research-related injuries.your participation in this research is voluntary. if you choose not to participate, or change your mind later, your decision will not affect your relationship with the researcher or your right to other services that you may be eligible for.in the event of any distress you may have related to this research, you will be given access to appropriate resources.the researcher may stop you from taking part in this research without your consent if you experience side effects that make your emotional condition worse. if you become too emotionally distressed during the research, you may have to drop out.