What is a trivial culture versus a captive culture

The answer to this question: What is a trivial culture vs. a captive culture, would be, that the captive culture develops from elements that are forced upon the people, like it happened in China during Mao´s cultural revolution, while the trivial culture develops from elements that are too superficial and without any depth.

These concepts were born from two books: "1984" by George Orwell (captive culture), who showed in his novel how culture was attained by a society through forceful decisions made by a specific authority, and which limited the expression of anything outside of the norm, and from the book "Brave New World", by Aldous Huxely, which was the total opposite. This novel, unlike "1984", portrays a society whose cultural development comes from absolutely superficial elements, tied to mass media and generalized systems of belief and behavior, and not from anything deeper. It protrays a society that is overdriven by diversion, and distractions of all kinds, and thus can be used as an example of a trivial culture since this one where certain elements given to society allow it to form very superficial aspects of culture.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

the structure of state governments are determined by. "state constitutins'

under the us constitution, all state governments are.'republics'