As a source why might a historian question the reliability of the rig veda as a historical document

A historian might question the rig Veda as a historical document due to the fact that they were said orally.

As oral documents, there may have been some alterations to it and it would be difficult for the historian to know what is true or what is not about the stories.

The rig Veda is an ancient collection of hymns of Indian Sanskrit origin. The Veda are a chant that is said while praising the Hindu god.

It was originally written in the Vedic language but it got to be rewritten in the Sanskrit language. This is one reason why the historian may question its reliability.

Read more on link

The answer is: it is ancient and written in Sanskrit so things will be lost in translation

The original text of the rig veda has never been found by historians, but they found a couple of reference that was left by past civilizations.

Because of this, there is a pretty good chance that past civilizations also made a couple of mistakes when translating the original text. This make the current interpretation of the document become unreliable.

tbh idk same thing here

answer; /// i believe the correct answer is (when one group has an extremely high score at pretest;