The right to own a gun is today considered fundamental to many in the United States. While the Second Amendment to the Constitution is often considered the origin of this ideal, it actually was instituted by elites as one of many special "white rights" to ensure cooperation against rebellions and subsequently became part of

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

The right to own a gun is today considered fundamental to many in the United States. While the Second Amendment to the Constitution is often considered the origin of this ideal, it actually was instituted by elites as one of many special "white rights" to ensure cooperation against rebellions and subsequently became part of white privileges.

And this topic has become a difficult issue that is part of the daily political debate in United States Politics. Since there have been many events involving weapons and shootings in public places such as supermarkets, school premises, or in the streets, a new tense debate has been created between people that support much stronger legislation to regulate the uses of guns and the people that supports light legislation to carry guns because they think is a Constitutional right.

do all equestions have to be answered

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.