How did politics differ in the Roman Empire from the politics of the Roman Republic? Do not put yes or no or links please.
will give brainliest

a
In the Roman Republic, the Senate represented the emperor's views, while in the Roman Empire, the Senate represented the people's views.

b
The Roman Republic had a system of checks and balances. This system was in place to keep any person or group of people from being too powerful. In the Roman Empire, there was no such system. The emperor held all the power. He controlled the entire government

c
In the Roman Republic, the Senate represented the people's views, while in the Emperor's (Imperial) Rome , the Senate represented the emperor's view.

d
In the Roman Republic, the Senate represented the everyone's views, while in The Roman Empire the Emperor represented the Emperor's views.

The largest functional difference between the late republic and the early imperial government was essential that the republic was unable to control the vast empire while the imperial system could. The key problem raised by the Roman republic’s size as it was not able to control the military, a problem that led to several rounds of civil war and political murder. By contrast the centralized autocratic powers vested in an emperor combined with a small personal army were usually enough to control the military.

While it might be expected that a republic would have a fairer and more peaceful foreign policy it is important to remember that both governments engaged in brutal wars of conquest. Indeed much of the key expansion of the Roman Empire occurred while it was still a Republic. Rome was an empire long before it was imperial.

I hope this helps!

answer; i do believe that its(gestation,suction-aspiration or vacuum aspiration;

could you go a bit more in depth with you question? it's quite hard to understand. as soon as you do that i will be glad to : )