subject

Gladian works as a plumber for Jackson Plumbing. When he is at Smithby’s house, he tries to fix the Smithby’s satellite dish causing the unit to overheat and causing a fire. What is Jackson Plumbing’s best defense regarding liability?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:00
How did the aztec culture benefit spain when they were conquering the aztecs?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:50
Persons who have not yet attained the legal age of consent under the applicable laws in the jurisdiction in which the research was approved.persons who are under 18 years of age.persons who have not yet attained the legal age of consent under the applicable laws in the jurisdiction in which the research will be conducted.persons who are under 21 years of age.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:40
Acriterion for waiving informed consent is that, when appropriate, subjects are provided additional pertinent information after the study. in which of the following studies would it not be appropriate to provide subjects with information about missing elements of consent: a study in which researchers told students that they would be given a quiz after reading some study materials when the researchers did not intend to use a quiz, but were attempting to focus subjects’ attention on the material.a study in which subjects were told that they performed in the third quartile on an anagram task when in reality students were randomly assigned scores that were not related to their actual performance.a study in which subjects were assigned to study activities based on an undesirable or unflattering physical characteristic as assessed by members of the research team.a study involving decision-making games in which subjects were led to believe that they were interacting with another student in another room, but were actually interacting with a computer programmed to provide consistent responses to all subjects.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50
Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Gladian works as a plumber for Jackson Plumbing. When he is at Smithby’s house, he tries to fix the...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 10.09.2020 01:01
question
Mathematics, 10.09.2020 01:01
question
Mathematics, 10.09.2020 01:01
question
Mathematics, 10.09.2020 01:01
question
Biology, 10.09.2020 01:01
Questions on the website: 13722367