Is national approach good or bad explain in a paragraph 8-10 sentence *ONLY NEED YOU PARAGARGH*
You get it right you will be a brainiest

:

I am for national unity/social cohesion at any place and any time but not anyhow. The idea of national unity in Guyana is good but the approach is bad. The principle is sound but the practice is subversive. First, I would like to see the new regime deliver to the Guyanese people what was promised in the 100 day manifesto before uniting with any other political parties. The new regime must demonstrate that it can stand on its legs so that when problems surface it will not collapse into a cocoon pointing fingers at others. So far, it has stumbled from one crisis to the other. To be fair, I would add another zero to the 100 days promise making it 1000 days before encouraging any unity. The new regime must show that it can stand on its own.

the answer is:

it led to riots and destruction of jewish shops, homes, and synagogues.

it turned german citizens against jews.