Do you think it is fair that representatives and senators have benefits that include things like free postal services when they already make over $100,000. Make sure you will be able to support your opinion one way or another.

Personally, I believe that it is totally incorrect and immoral that politicians, who earn huge sums of money through their political positions, have greater benefits such as free postal mail or the use of certain services such as drivers, free transfers for issues outside their political role, etc. I consider this because politicians earn salaries that are practically double the national average salaries, and they are financed by the taxes of citizens, even those who earn minimum salaries. For this reason, I consider that it would be a good show of solidarity for politicians to renounce these benefits, in order to collaborate with the public, reducing their fiscal effort by even a small percentage.

explanation:

may i ask what challenges?

this statement is true.

forests are public goods, available for everybody. when usage of such a good becomes interesting for consumers and its usage increases, there can be a risk of overexploitation. it is a non rival good therefore, if one person consumes the good it does not reduce the availability for subsequent consumers.

these caracteristics require the establishment of measures in order to prevent the destruction of a commonly owned space, for example, to restrict the amount of people that have access to the same time.