Your conclusion will include a summary of the lab results and an interpretation of the results. Please write in complete sentences.
1. Did your data support your hypothesis? Use evidence to explain.

2. Which material refracted the light rays the most: air, water, or glass?

3. Which material refracted the light rays the least: air, water, or
glass?

4. How does density affect refraction?

5. Diamonds are a very dense material. Predict what would happen to the light ray if you
projected it from air through a diamond

6. Explain where you observe reflection, refraction, and absorption of light in your everyday
activities

delete this question pls it wont let me exit out

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals