Napisz 2 argumenty do 2 tez Teza: kto pod kim dołki kopie, sam w nie wpada i druga teza: każdy jest kowalem swojego losu prosze ratujcie mnie :')

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?

Using the president's schedule, identify one example of the president using constitutional powers and fulfilling his duties. then, explain how and why that power is limited. give your answer in the form of at least three complete sentences.

When a explodes, radioactive material is dispersed. understanding terrorism: select the best answer from the choices provided. a. germ bomb b. dirty bomb c. chemical explosive d. commercial airplane