subject
Social Studies, 22.03.2021 23:00 carter4026

Answer the following questions about interest groups OR political action committees. 1. How does an interest group or political action committee help a candidate?
2. How does an interest group or political action committee help the voter during the
campaign?
3. Describe how interest groups or political action committees are BOTH good and
bad for American politics.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:00
What is another name for the spanish navy in 1588? a) spanish royal fleet b) spanish armada c) spanish yacht crew d) spanish tall ships
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:30
What is the difference between one’s motive and one’s intent to commit a crime, and which is the most important in our legal system?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:50
In 1866, a mob in which tennessee city attacked local african americans and burned down homes and schools?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Answer the following questions about interest groups OR political action committees. 1. How does an...
Questions
question
History, 02.08.2019 16:50
Questions on the website: 13722361