"In considering the requirements for the rehabilitation of Europe the physical loss of life, the visible destruction of cities, factories, mines, and railroads was correctly estimated, but it has
become obvious during recent months that this visible
destruction was probably less serious than the dislocation of the entire fabric of European economy
Aside from the demoralizing effect on the world at large and the possibilities of disturbances arising as a result of the
desperation of the people concerned, the consequences to the economy of the United States should be apparent to all. It is
logical that the United States should do whatever it is able to do to assist in the return of normal economic health in the world,
without which there can be no political stability and no assured peace."
- Excerpt from the Marshall Plan (1948)
Which event is being referenced in the passage as a cause for Europe's financial destruction?
A)
World War I
B)
World War 11
Great Depression
D)
Spanish Civil War

What do both article ii of the arizona constitution and the first amendment to the us constitution grant? check all that apply. right to assemble right to legal search and seizure freedom of the press freedom of religion right to maintain a militia

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?

In what ways are some local executive branches structured in a similar manner to state executive branches, and in what ways are some structured differently?