Why does hobson condone western imperialism in asia

Seeing that the Imperialism of the last three decades is clearly condemned as a business policy, in that at enormous expense it has produced a small, bad, unsafe increase of markets, and has jeopardized the entire wealth of the nation in rousing the strong resentment of other nations.

Each country requires a more diverse form of market to develop itself and a vast region to make industrial and economical advancements. While the British rule had a more influential effects inside the Asian region and for that they also introduced the East India Company. After, which the the British empire started its expansion inside the region, while the military was deployed along with these activities which then resulted in making associations with the regional monarchs. As the British rule was really not fair to people as it consumed most of the revenue and generated a much stronger economy and had a more diverse form of market place.

While, J.Atkinson Hobson was against the western imperialism inside the Asian region. Because he believed that the system made advancements by consuming the gold and revenue of the region, as they had more strategical plans and more techniques to generate the revenue that resulted in a much stronger economy for the British rule. The residents of the  Asian region were not provided by there basic rights, as there properties were confiscated by the imperial rule.

Isay b but i'm not sure. 

Any answer choices that would me answer your question?