What was the result on appeal in Evan Rothberg v. Walt Disney Pictures, the case in the textbook in which a representative of the defendant convinced Robert Jahn, a senior executive at Disney who was dying from AIDS, to sign a release that waived his rights to approximately $2 million in employee benefits days before his death?

You are a member of the jury for a murder case. the prosecution has presented dna evidence linking the defendant to the crime scene. the defense claims that dna evidence using str analysis with 13 markers is not sufficient to reliably distinguish between people. what do you think? a. the defense is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 1 million chance of two people having the same pattern, leaving a reasonable doubt. b. str analysis is not sufficient. the defendant's entire genome should be sequenced. the prosecution will have to consult a genomic library to make sure their dna evidence is valid. c. the prosecution is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 10 billion or greater chance that two people will have the same pattern. this person was at the crime scene. d. dna evidence is not generally accepted by legal experts.

Which of the following statements about the effects of subliminal stimuli is most accurate? subliminal stimuli have no effect on attitudes or behavior. subliminal stimuli can lead people to vote for political candidates they do not support. subliminal exposure to thirst-related words can lead thirsty people to drink more. subliminal stimuli can lead people to violate deeply held values.

If you were a colonist who went to the continental congress meeting and heard patrick henry's speech, how would it have inspired (change your mind) about your actions? (to go to war with britain or make peace) explain. faster if you can