PLEASE HELP Imagine that your family is moving to SE Asia. You can choose from the following regions: The Himalayas, Tibetan Plateau, Gobi Desert, Taklimakan Desert, Huang He River, Yangtze River, or Ganges River. You need to convince your family why the region you chose would be a great place to relocate. Be sure to include at least 3 specific reasons to support your opinion (climate, location, natural resources, etc.). Be creative! You have two options of how to present your information. Please choose one:

Complete the Quick Pic Activity (SE Asia Pop and Trade Quick Pic) by choosing a region to draw and color a picture of and write a paragraph supporting your choice. (To submit this choice, print the PDF or do the activity on notebook paper, then take a picture and upload the file).

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.