Liberals argue that free trade and open markets are always in a state's best interest, but mercantilists/statists and radicals disagree with this contention. What alternatives to unfettered trade and markets do statists and radicals propose, and why? If
you were the leader of a developing country, which of the three perspectives-liberal, statist, or radical-would you find most
appealing, and why?

explanation:

pay attention. give the speaker your undivided attention, and acknowledge the message.

show that you're listening. use your own body language and gestures to show that you are engaged.

provide feedback.

defer judgment.

respond appropriately.

your answer is "graduates" hope this

d. i assume the underlined word is "role." reformat if it isn't.

explanation:

role is closest to part because when replacing words, "playing a vital decision," "playing a vital activity," and "playing a vital dollar" don't make logical sense. the only meaningful choice is "playing a vital part."

this fits one of merriam-webster's definitions of role: "a function or part performed especially in a particular operation or process."

answer; the government can clearly justify the restriction;