subject
Social Studies, 28.02.2021 21:00 dommalb

Patrick Henry, a noteworthy supporter of American independence in the revolutionary period, was a prominent Anti-Federalist. Which portion of the US Constitution would Henry most likely have opposed?

the preamble
the Bill of Rights
the supremacy clause
the reserved powers clause

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:30
What do these fatwas indicate with regard to the balance between practical legal reasoning and religious dictates answers?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:30
Locate an article online from a news source that illustrates at least one determinant of supply. write a summary of the article, list the determinant(s) that were discussed in the article, and give a brief explaination of the effect of the determinant(s). you don't need to write the entire thing out, just find a source and tell me what i should include. i'm not the best at some parts of economics, and this is one of the parts i suck at.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 11:00
In the 1950s and 1960s, chief justice earl warren was a strong advocate for?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Patrick Henry, a noteworthy supporter of American independence in the revolutionary period, was a pr...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 01.09.2019 16:50
Questions on the website: 13722363