Please help (due at 3:05) pick any question you want 10. How many electoral college votes does a candidate need in order to become president?

11. Do you think the electoral college is fair? Explain your answer.

12. What is the Supreme Court doing when they interpret laws?

13. What is the 2 step process to be on the Supreme Court?

14. Is having 12 jurors in district court appropriate? Explain your answer.

10. a candidate needs to vote of at least 270 electors.

11.no the electoral college is not fair because it is undemocratic a permits the election of a candidate who does not win the most votes and its winners take all approach cancels the votes of the losing candidates in each state.

12.although the supreme Court may hear an appeal on any question of law provided it has jurisdiction it usually does not hold trials. instead the courts task is to enter prep the meaning of Allah to decide whether Allah is revelant to a particular set of fact or to rule on how Allah should be applied.

13.the president nominate someone for a vacancy on the court and the Senate votes to confirm the nominee which require the simple majority. in this way both of executive and legislative branches of the federal government have a voice in the composition of the supreme court.

14. having 12 jurors is appropriate because it's their sense of how big a jury should be to impure proper deliberation and to include fairness in the trial.

Explanation:

Hope this helped Mark BRAINLEST!!

chronological thinking is an indispensable tool to structure a historical narrative and to give meaning to a sequence of events. the final section presents the results of a survey to test the chronological thinking of lower secondary school students carried out by the educational research institute.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.