Social Studies, 30.01.2020 01:02 stevenabdullatif16

Summarize the details of mcculloch v. maryland and gibbons v. ogden from jacksonís perspective.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

McCulloh v Maryland and Gibbon B. Ogden Basically upheld the right
Of the congress to create a national bank
This will give the congress more implied powers and will increase their power

hope this helps

Answer from: drice517

-In the case of McCulloch v. Maryland, in 1819, the United States Supreme Court pronounced a landmark decision on federalism in the United States. The State of Maryland had attempted to interfere with the operation of a branch of the nation's Second Bank of the United States by charging a tax on all banknotes issued by non-Maryland banks. The Supreme Court declared the law to impose the tax unconstitutional because it conflicted with Congress's implicit legislative powers based on the "Necessary and Proper" Clause of the First Article of the United States Constitution. The clause gives Congress the power to pass laws beyond the explicitly stated catalog of jurisdictions, as long as these laws are necessary and proper to implement the explicitly named legislative powers. The jurisprudence on implicit competences has been incorporated as an implied powers doctrine into international law and other jurisdictions.

-In the case Gibbons vs Ogden, it was intended to preserve the supremacy of a license granted to Gibbons to navigate throughout the North American territory.

Thus judge John Marshall considered that the license granted to Gibbons was legal as soon as both the licenses granted to Robert R. Livingston and Robert Fulton were legal too, however, stressed that in maritime matters the only one that could determine laws of this nature was the Congress itself and not the New York legislature.

In such a way, Judge Marshall indicated that there were two types of acts; some that were of the exclusive nature of the Congress and that the states could not legislate in any degree and those that the states could legislate when the Congress had previously legislated in the same matter.

Thus, Judge Marshall mentioned that the law emanating from the Congress would have to be the supreme law in both cases, and in case there was some interference with state laws, federal laws would have supremacy.

Answer from: Quest

the first option is correct

mark me brainliest

~courtney

Answer from: Quest

6.3%

explanation:

the acceptance rate for yale university is 6.3%. this means that only 6 percent of people who apply actually get accepted!

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30

The owner of a one-acre parcel of land with a small house on it rented the property to a professor of a nearby college at a monthly rental of $500. several years later, after the professor got tenure, the parties orally agreed that the professor would purchase the property from the owner for the sum of $60,000, payable at the rate of $500 a month for 10 years. they agreed that the owner would give the professor a deed to the property after five years had passed and $30,000 had been paid toward the purchase price, and that the professor would execute a note secured by a mortgage for the balance. the professor continued in possession of the property and made all monthly payments in a timely fashion. when he had paid $30,000, he tendered a proper note and mortgage to the property owner and demanded that she deliver the deed as agreed. the owner refused because valuable minerals had been discovered on adjacent parcels in recent months, causing the value of this parcel of land to increase to 10 times its former value. the professor brought suit against the property owner for specific performance. if the court rules in favor of the property owner, what is the likely reason?

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 07:30

Recall that in one condition of the experiment conducted by stasser and titus (1985) about student council president candidates, all group members had access to the same information, and that in another condition, members had unique information that other group members didn't know. in the second (unshared information) condition, the group made a worse decision than in the first (shared information) condition. this occurred because groups seldom can agree on who is most expert. focus discussion on the information that all members know. often ignore dissenting opinions. avoid differences of opinion, given conformity pressures.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 10:40

Kay is a thoughtful and considerate person but has a difficult time making decisions on her own. she relies on her one best friend, someone she has known since childhood, to give her advice on virtually every decision she makes. sometimes kay even asks the friend to make the decision for her. at work, she holds a position far below her potential and has refused several promotion opportunities. she is most likely suffering from personality disorder.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 10:50

Francine, a college freshman, has agreed to participate in a psychology research study. before she begins her participation, she reads a statement written by the researcher explaining the purpose of the research and the potential risks of participation. it also explains that francine is free to withdraw from the research at any time. in providing francine with this statement, the researcher has followed the ethical guidelines of for participants.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Summarize the details of mcculloch v. maryland and gibbons v. ogden from jacksonís perspective....

Questions