A case comes before a Wisconsin state trial court on the subject of free speech on the Internet. It is a case of first impression, meaning that no case involving the same issue has been decided by the Wisconsin courts. In deciding such a case, it would not be considered proper for the judge to consider a. cases from other jurisdictions. b. social values and customs. c. public policy. d. the judge's personal feelings about the Internet.

D. The judge's personal feelings about the Internet.

Explanation:

Most times our personal perception of things can ruin our judgement of those things. Probably the individual had a bad experience using that thing or going to that event but other individuals have tried it and it worked for them. In those scenario judging from your own point of experience or view alone is not a good choice.

In the case to be decided the judge should not consider his personal feeling about the internet.

concurrent jurisdiction is the ability to exercise judicial review by different courts at the same time, within the same territory, and over the same subject matter. for instance, a domestic violence matter may be heard in either a general civil court or a family court in the same county. whichever court actually exercises its jurisdiction first will do so exclusively.

where's the