Identify each of the following as a claim of fact, a claim of value, or a claim of policy. Explain what kinds of evidence you would use to support or refute each claim. What assumptions and implications would you associate with each claim? What warrants? a. The popularity of reality television has decreased the willingness of media executives to develop, fund, and support more imaginative television shows. b. Rather than sending men and women into outer space, we should be using those resources to fix the problems with public schools. c. Global warming is a misnomer; what is happening is less a result of human energy use and more a simple experience of long-term climatic change. d. Social harmony is more important than personal freedom. e. It is necessary that people be allowed to curse and use foul language on occasion, because such uses of language let off steam that might otherwise result in violence. 4. On a topic of your choice, create one example each of a claim of fact, a claim of value, and a claim of policy. Then explain how you would provide evidence in their support

3.

a. claim of fact

b. claim of policy

c. claim of value

d. claim of value

e. claim of policy

Explanation:

3.

a. This is a claim of fact because there are available (factual) data that back that statement.

b. This is a claim because the speaker is directing attention to what needs to done policywise to solve the problem they observed in public schools.

c. The expression here shows the speaker's personal values about the environment.

d. The expression here also shows the speaker's personal values about the environment.

e. The expression "people be allowed" shows that the statement is one of policy. What the speaker feels should be done policywise on the subject.

4. Here's a point to note about your topic of choice:

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.

answer; disconfirm the catharsis theory;